Monday, September 1, 2025

US Open Tennis Drama

The U.S. Open tennis tournament always seems to come with its share of drama. Usually, it's something like a clash between two players or a heated moment between a player and the umpire — like when Serena Williams had that famous argument with the umpire in 2018, or when Daniil Medvedev got into it with the crowd a few years ago. Last week American player Taylor Townsend and Czech player Barbora Krejcikova got into an argument on court after their match. 

Two days ago, something different happened — this time, between two spectators. 

Polish tennis player Kamil Majchrzak had just won his match and was hanging out with fans, signing autographs and on tennis balls. He noticed a young kid in the crowd and, in a sweet gesture, took off his cap and handed it to the child. 

That’s when things took a turn. A man standing nearby suddenly grabbed the cap from the kid’s hands and just walked off with it. 

Turns out, the man is Piotr Szczerek — a millionaire and CEO of a company in Poland. When reporters asked him about it later, he didn’t apologize at all. Instead, he arrogantly said, “Yeah, I took it. I did it in a rush. But hey, first come, first served — that’s life.” 

At the time, Majchrzak didn’t see what had happened because he was still signing autographs. But when he found out later, he got in touch with the boy and his mother and gave them not just another cap, but also his shirt and a bunch of other gifts. 

Social media, as always, didn’t hold back. People were furious. Many called the CEO a jerk and a coward. One person summed it up by posting, “Only a complete idiot and jerk would snatch a hat from a child.”


PS: Latest news. September 1 6.58 pm California time. That Polish CEO apologized to that kid, the fans, and the Polish player.

Saturday, August 23, 2025

Sharpest Comebacks

Ronald Reagan vs. Walter Mondale (1984 Debate) 

A question was asked about his age during the debate. 

Reagan replied: “I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent’s youth and inexperience.” 

Margaret Thatcher vs. Labor MP (UK Parliament, 1990) 

In a heated Commons exchange about Thatcher's leadership and her government's truthfulness, Hughes insinuated that Thatcher had misled the House regarding her policies and economic impact. 

Thatcher's Reply: “The honorable gentleman knows that the essence of being a gentleman is that one does not lie. He is no gentleman.” 

François Mitterrand vs. Valéry Giscard d’Estaing (France, 1981) 

“You do not have a monopoly on heart.” Mr. Giscard 

Mitterrand’s Famous Reply: “You do not have a monopoly on heart, Mr. Giscard. You do not have a monopoly on reason either.” 

Here is my all-time favorite: 

Lloyd Bentsen vs Dan Quayle during 1988 Vice Presidential Debate 

Moderator Tom Brokaw asked Dan Quayle about his qualifications to become President. 

Quayle Replied: I have as much experience in the Congress as Jack Kennedy did when he sought the presidency. 

Lloyd Bentsen immediately retorted: "Senator, I served with Jack Kennedy. I knew Jack Kennedy. Jack Kennedy was a friend of mine. Senator, you’re no Jack Kennedy."

Sunday, August 10, 2025

Class Act

John West, a 64 year old man from Detroit, spent 34 years working at the Ford Motor Company. His five sons wanted to honor their dad, so they nominated him to be a contestant on the game show Deal or No Deal. 

During the show the (football team) Detroit Lions quarterback Matthew Stafford sent a video message wishing them luck—and offered autographed gym bags and tickets to their football game for him and his 5 sons; (This is equivalent to Tendulkar offering tickets to his match to a Mumbai fan on live television.). Of course, Detroit Lions Football team is owned by the Ford Family.

Then, Ford’s President of Global Operations, Joe Hinrichs, surprised John with a plaque honoring his 34 years of service at Ford. 

Final Surprise: 

John and his sons were invited to lunch at Ford’s headquarters with Bill Ford, the Executive Chairman of Ford Motor Company.  

I know this is a PR for Ford Motors. They must of have paid more than a million dollars for this. 

But still, I would consider this as a “Class Act” to honoring a 34 year service of a low level employee.