Saturday, November 26, 2016

More Election Drama

Trump won the electoral college votes. So he was declared the winner. Hillary won the popular votes. Still she accepted and conceded defeat.
 
During the election debates, Trump said if elected he would investigate Hillary’s email server problem and the Clinton Foundation and put her in jail. After winning the election Trump said he will not investigate Clinton and he has other important things to do.
 
And now comes the drama. An independent candidate who also ran for President of the United States, Jill Stein, has started a process for recounting the votes in 3 States – Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. All 3 states were won by Trump by a narrow margin. It will cost her money to do that. She has appealed to the “Trump haters” and raised about $7 million.
 
What is her reason to ask for a recount? She said she suspects the voting machines were hacked. I have never heard a more ridiculous thing in a long time. I am not a computer expert. Some of my readers are computer experts. So please tell me if I am wrong. Voting machines are not connected to the internet. If so, how is it possible to “hack”?
 
At first, Hillary Clinton said she will have nothing to do with the recount. Now her campaign says it will take part in the recount effort.
 
So what I suspect will happen? Trump is not a good guy. He is a vicious guy. I have a feeling he is going to re-open the Clinton investigation – email server and Clinton Foundation. (For those who are not familiar with the US Presidential powers, let me say one thing. In the US, when a President is elected, they are electing a “dictator” for a 4 year term. He/she is that powerful.)
 
There is already a rumor going around that about 3 million non-citizen illegal immigrants voted for Hillary Clinton, majority of them in California. May be Trump supporters want to have a recount in every state in this country.
 
Pure entertainment if you are not personally involved. At least, this will be resolved in a few days/weeks. Unlike India.
 
Mr. P. Chidambaram contested the Lok Sabha election in 2009. His opponent was declared the winner. After 30 minutes, the election authorities changed the results declaring Mr. Chidambaram as the winner. The votes that were tabulated to Mr. Chidambaram was given to his opponent and vice versa. The authorities said that the computer operator made an error in posting. The opponent claimed his votes were illegally transferred to the credit of Mr. Chidambaram, thereby tilting the result in Chidambaram's favor.
 
The opponent filed a case in the court. Mr. Chidambaram became Finance Minister. New Lok Sabha elections came in 2014. Now it is 2016, almost 2017. That 2009 election case is still going on in the courts.

24 comments:

  1. It is very unlikely the recount would alter the results.Barring Michigan where the machines are connected to internet,in most other states where the votes are counted electronically through optical scanner the integrity of result cannot be questioned.in states like Pennsylvania where the votes are cast through touch screen that leave no paper trail,recount is ineffective.People are skeptical about a change in outcome due to recount.
    Trump has been chosen and will remain the president for four years for sure.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments Mr. KP. I have to hand it to you. You are very knowledgeable about the U.S. Elections. Now Mr. Trump will go back on his words not to go after Hillary. Me think.

      Delete
    2. I am not so sure. The responsibilities of office and the likely public perception would dissuade him from any rash step.Even on the election campaign rhetoric, the ground realities will make him mellowed in his actions.

      Delete
    3. Thanks Mr. KP. Trump does not forgive that easily.

      Delete
  2. I think something similar happened when al Gore lost by a very close margin. Even then there was no change in the election results. So I guess a change is not much of a possibility this time.

    Destination Infinity

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments Rajesh. Yes it happened for Gore. Now, it is the losers being sore losers.

      Delete
  3. Here in India, many times we hear about dummy or decoy candidates in elections. These are typically friends or acquaintances of politicians who stand in elections for Parliamant, State Legislature or Local Bodies' seats. These people are used to help the actual politician to win by somehow doing what he/she would have done.

    I don't know how or why, but I feel that Ms. Jill Stein is somehow working for Hillary :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments Karunesh. I have the same feeling too.

      Delete
  4. Hey SG just enjoy the drama with cup of coffee... :) :) :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. Interesting post election happening!
    India is changing and hopefully it will rise again :-)
    TC, keep smiling :-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments Sindhu. I am sure India will rise again.

      Delete
  6. As I have no idea about the U S it's nice to read your posts .indian stories ya I watch in the tv . 500 1000 etc etc still everything is a mess .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments Shilpa. Please tell me how to exchange for those living abroad.

      Delete
  7. Is there any precedent of recounting in the USA ? In India it is there and sometimes it may be carried to the court.As you said it goes on and goes on.

    Anyway people nowadays create turbulence aplenty in the quite of common people, may it be the USA or any other.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments Sarala. Yes, there have a few instances of recounting in USA.

      Delete
  8. And now comes the drama. An independent candidate who also ran for President of the United States, Jill Stein, has started a process for recounting the votes in 3 States – Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan. All 3 states were won by Trump by a narrow margin. It will cost her money to do that. She has appealed to the “Trump haters” and raised about $7 million.....This is new juicy news! Let us wait and see:)

    The court cases take decades to give results in our country.

    Next juicy news is: Will Mrs.Obama contest for the next Presidential election or not?:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments Sandhya. Michelle Obama? No chance. My bet is on Kamala Harris, an Indian-American newly elected senator. I wrote about her being a future president 2 years ago.

      Delete
    2. This is good news, thank you, SG! We can be proud of her. She need not be and will not be partial to her motherland...We can just be proud!

      Delete
    3. Thanks Sandhya. Please read my post written in April 2013 about Kamala Harris being the future President of United States.

      https://sg-shootthebreeze.blogspot.com/2013/04/a-name-to-remember.html

      Delete
  9. I usually stay faaaaar away from politics and that's the reason why you don't see my comment on the other posts as well. Anyway, can't believe people have chosen a racist :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments Ash. Trump may be a racist. But, even before he assumes office (on Jan 20), Trump threatened United Technologies and demanded that they do not move their Carrier Plant (air conditioner factory in Indianapolis) to Mexico. United Technologies blinked and agreed.

      Ash, politics is about telling a better story. Trump will ride on this story for the next 4 years.

      Delete
  10. Ooh!! So we will get to enjoy some more drama from the US political arena. Looking forward to see it through your words :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for your comments Shilpa. I am glad you liked this post.

      Delete